Layoffs, restructurings and pivots to digital were the hallmarks of Singapore’s media in 2017. And 2018 isn’t much better.

Don't hold your breath.

By Kirsten Han
Splice Singapore

2018 is setting up to be the toughest year for Singapore’s news industry as long-awaited restructurings take hold.

About 130 staff were let go in October as Singapore Press Holdings sped up its cost-cutting and restructuring efforts. That the process was botched—with some staff finding out they had been sacked after being unable to log into the computer network—rubbed salt into the wound.

For the next few days, Singaporeans read news reports of editorial staff told to clear their desks and the seemingly arbitrary way in which firing decisions had been made. A former employee of The Straits Times, who asked to remain anonymous, told Splice that junior reporters—across the sub-editing, news desk and lifestyle sections—bore the brunt of the retrenchments, while editors with much higher salaries kept their jobs.

SPH hasn’t been the only source of pain for journalists, though. Months before, MediaCorp’s TODAY newspaper announced that it would be going digital-only. Retrenchments followed, and journalists across different desks were cut.

Schadenfreude in Singapore

Among the online chatter was a sense of schadenfreude; SPH titles like the Straits Times—Singapore’s only English-language general news broadsheet—have long been criticised as being “government mouthpieces” due to restrictions imposed by laws (such as the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act) that give the Singapore government significant sway over the running, and therefore the content, of the publication. Against this backdrop, announcements of cost-cutting and retrenchment provided some with a grim sense of satisfaction at the appearance of a state-sponsored ship taking on water.

But the government won’t be the only one that loses if mainstream media outlets deteriorate; Singaporeans will be affected too. SPH and MediaCorp employ the largest newsgathering force in Singapore; even the independent or “alternative” news websites take their cues from the stories and developments unearthed by publications like the Straits Times.

If the mainstream media fails to do its job, there is a lack of other players who can step in to fill that vacuum.

Independent news websites in Singapore are struggling to survive.

Especially when you’re seen as ‘alternative’ media.


Of course, a giant like SPH is not about to go under. It’s still profitable, supported by revenue from its property arm. And even if its profits decline, it’s unlikely that the Singapore government would allow it to burn—the near-monopoly it has on the media scene here is still hugely useful for the powerful seeking to establish their narrative and communicate their policies.

Media surrender remains unlikely

To be fair, the mainstream media is doing what it can to change. An internal email sent by Straits Times’ editor-in-chief Warren Fernandez and seen by Splice lays out the paper’s game plan: a shift in focus to getting stories onto digital platforms first, moving away from a mindset of “protecting print subscriptions above all else”, adding capacity to the digital team, strengthening the foreign news desk and producing more premium content to convince readers to pay.

“This means more exclusives, scoops, special reports and projects, analysis, video and interactive digital content. We will have to do less of the run-of-the-mill diary jobs and commodity news,” Fernandez wrote in the email.

Additionally, Fernandez and executive editor Sumiko Tan will chair “The Pitch”, an informal session for journalists with longer-term projects that can be developed across platforms. “If we bite, you will be given time and resources to pursue your story idea or project,” Fernandez promised.

Some of these changes are a long time coming, but questions also remain over the Straits Times’—or any other mainstream media outlet’s—ability to produce the hard-hitting type of storytelling that will attract readers and build a publication’s brand.

State control and interference remain a factor. The former reporter at The Straits Times described restrictions within the newsroom, by now internalized and entrenched: “Now and then, the editors will get calls from the government, either politicians to the senior editors, or ministry staff to the mid-level editors. But I never thought it was overwhelming. It seemed more like a case of having the right sort of ‘yes man’ in place. So even before anyone from the [ruling People’s Action Party] or the government had to say something, I would have done a bit of self-censorship, and my editors and copy editors would also have [done].”

The paper’s opinion editor, Chua Mui Hoong, appeared to allude to such government curbs and meddling in an October op-ed. “While Singapore can ring-fence print media production to some extent via licensing and newspaper printing laws, it can’t ring-fence users from exposure to news, information and entertainment available online, streamed into homes, and onto tablets and mobile devices,” she wrote.

She then added: “But the state cannot and must not hold back mainstream media companies from engaging fully with the competition for attention and subscription dollars that is reaching our shores. To do so is to hobble the local media even before the fight begins.”

Kirsten Han

Kirsten Han is a Singaporean freelance journalist and writer. She's also the editor-in-chief of New Naratif. Follow Kirsten Han on Twitter.

From this week


Zuck was prepared. The Senators weren’t.

Tuesday’s 5-hour Congressional hearings showed how little American politicians understand, let alone how to regulate them. The lawmakers, who came across as out-of-touch old men, had no points to make, apart from trying to score soundbites (compare this with Singapore’s grilling of Facebook a few weeks back). They couldn’t figure out what ad tech is, how advertising works, or what data Facebook collects. Zuck seemed nervous but confident — he’s been coached by internal and external consultants on this. His team even reconfigured a conference room to look like a congressional hearing room. Never underestimate this guy’s ability to learn. Investors were encouraged by Zuck’s performance, and the lowered risk of regulation. They sent the stock up 4.5% at the end of the testimony on Tuesday.

Governments & policy



Shen Lu left China to study journalism in the U.S. She writes perfectly in both languages.

But she finds it hard to get the career she wants on either side. She faces press restrictions in China, while U.S. newsrooms aren’t keen on hiring Chinese journalists. “If I had it to do over again, knowing what I know now, I doubt I’d make the decision to study journalism again, because the news industry—both in China and in the U.S.—seems to be a world designed to keep people like me out.”
China File


A year after they jumped on, The Economist gets over 7 million viewers a month on Snapchat.

Their daily Snaps are deep topical dives into things like racial divisions, vaping, the possibility of another cold — or World — war, and office predators. The experience is true to the medium (brisk, anonymous-but-personal) but also true to the brand (highly produced, perfectly-researched, documentary-style editing). Surprisingly, some of the visual design can be downright hideous: for a timeline of sexual harassment, they choose to go with white, drop-shadowed text against a background image of a cave painting. “Others are “top-Snap only” content. These often have lots of text on them... intended to be shareable/screenshot-able primers on a topic.” Huh. The ads are programmatically annoying (I got one that promised more Instagram followers). But I love how The Economist is using the platform, as do millions of Snapchatters. This day in the life of Lucy Rohr, their Snapchat editor, is revealing, and it's the only reason I have exhumed my Snapchat app after my short-lived and bewildered run-in with it many years ago. Okay fiiiiine, I also want to Boost My Brows.

I saw The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time at Singapore’s Esplanade last week.

The design of the production, by the otherworldly talent Bunny Christie, is brilliant, sensitive, frantic, filled with more LED wattage than a slap upside the head, and it has many more decibels than are physically available in the world. Christie, winner of a mountain of awards, is known for designing “psychology as well as space”, and she certainly redesigned my psychology for good. Interestingly, but not surprisingly, the production comes in another flavour: Relaxed. I think this is excellent design that addresses a very real need for audiences in the market for a different pace. From the programme: “Sound and lighting cues are modified to be less startling. Leaving the auditorium to take a break is fine and there is a designated Quiet Area available. There is an easy-going attitude to noise and movement, doors remain open and lights are dimmed staying on throughout the show.” Nice. Now if only life came with a Relaxed mode.
The Guardian