Meet the journalist who started a newsroom in Myanmar to cover Buddhist extremism.

Min Min and his team at Root Investigative Agency are putting their lives at risk to explain what's happening in Rakhine state.

By Joshua Carroll
Splice Myanmar

When monks threatened to kill Min Min for his reporting on Buddhist nationalism, they had hoped to scare him into silence. Instead, the experience inspired him to start his own news organization.  

The journalist was a senior editor at a local newspaper in Myanmar’s Rakhine state in early 2015 when he wrote a story about a nationalist protest in the state capital.

“Have Buddhist extremists taken control in Sittwe?” his headline asked. A week later he got an answer, of sorts, when a group of monks demanded Min Min meet them to explain his article.

“If the newspaper doesn’t give us an explanation, we might kill them or destroy their building,” one of the monks told his friend, who went to the meeting in his place.

Min Min stood his ground, insisting that his article was balanced and fair. But the owner of the newspaper refused to take his side.

“That made me realize I should do my own stuff,” he tells Splice. “I realized there were a lot of legitimate facts being suppressed for political reasons… if I’d stayed it would have been very difficult to speak the truth.”

Root Investigative Agency co-founder Min Min pitcured at his desk in the news agency's Sittwe office. Photo: Courtesy of RiA.
Root Investigative Agency co-founder Min Min pitcured at his desk in the news agency's Sittwe office. Photo: Courtesy of RiA.

Getting to the root of issues

His answer to the fear and self-censorship muzzling reporting in Rakhine was to co-found the Root Investigative Agency, or RiA, a Sittwe-based magazine and website focusing on human rights and the rule of law.

The outlet’s first story in September 2015, highlighted the fact that while stateless Rohingya Muslims are branded “immigrants” from Bangladesh and widely reviled in Rakhine, Buddhist migrants from Bangladesh have been welcomed and even given Myanmar citizenship.  

“What we do is not appreciated by nationalists and racists,” says Tin Aung Moe, a co-founder of RiA who is in charge of layout and design. “So of course guys with those attitudes dislike us and threaten us.”

The agency opened with less than a dozen staff, Min Min says, but some have since left due to safety concerns. They were subject to persistent online death threats​ from people who regard them as “traitors”.

“At first I thought it was just words,” says Min Min. Then, late one evening in March 2016, someone detonated a small bomb outside his house, which also served as RiA’s office. No one was in at the time, but shrapnel from the explosion tore holes through the building’s walls.

Min Min believes the attack was likely in response to RiA’s coverage of allegations that a Rakhine nationalist insurgent group, the Arakan Army, was involved in the narcotics trade. The outlet had also reported allegations that the insurgents, along with Myanmar’s military, were forcing villagers to work as porters.

As mistrust grows amid the Rohingya crisis, Myanmar tightens restrictions on foreign media.

It's getting tougher on the ground. This is Victoria Milko's story.


Attacks on journalists mounting

Since the start of the Myanmar military’s brutal campaign against Rohingya in northern Rakhine last August, the situation has become increasingly perilous for media working in the state.

Last month, a journalist who has worked with the Democratic Voice of Burma covering Rakhine narrowly survived being stabbed by unknown assailants in Sittwe.

And one of Min Min’s former RiA colleagues, Kyaw Soe Oo, is now facing 14 years in prison on official secrets act charges related to his reporting for Reuters on the Rakhine crisis. He and his colleague Wa Lone were arrested, it is believed, just as they were about to break a story revealing a mass grave in northern Rakhine.

Min Min fled to Yangon after the 2016 bomb attack, but has since returned to continue his work—despite the risks.

“RiA was founded to publish news about Rakhine state,” he says. “You can’t really write about Rakhine state without being here.”

It’s a pattern for Min Min. When religious riots struck Sittwe in 2012, many of his friends and neighbors fled the violence. But he stayed behind.

“It is important to face our fears,” he says, “rather than running from them.”

Joshua Carroll

Joshua Carroll is a freelance reporter based in Yangon, Myanmar. His work has been featured in The Daily Beast, The Guardian, The Times (of London) and others. Follow Joshua Carroll on Twitter.

From this week


Columbia Journalism Review takes a hard look at the journalism funding done by Facebook and Google.

There are millions of dollars going into this space. While many are happy to take the money on the table, others question the ethics behind it. “The British Empire wanted trains in Kenya and India to run well, too. So their concerns are sincere, but the effect is more often than not a deeper immersion in and dependence on these platforms.” Of course this isn’t an issue unique to the tech giants — grant-giving NGOs have also faced similar critics.
Columbia Journalism Review

Governments & policy



New Naratif put together a solid story on how the Muslim Cyber Army works in Indonesia.

If you haven’t heard of the MCA (no, not that MCA in Malaysia!), they have been spreading fake news and driving hate speech along religious and ethnic lines. Worrying trend, especially in a country that’s been fighting fake news factories like Saracen. What makes this one different? “MCA looks more ideological, has thousands of networks in different parts of Indonesia and therefore the destructive power of this group is greater than that of Saracen.”
New Naratif


The New York Times is partnering with FX and Hulu on a weekly documentary series called…The Weekly.

It centres around stories from the Times and the journalists that work them. This comes hot on the heels of The Daily, their incredible podcast about one daily story from the Times newsroom. This is part of the Times’ ongoing foray into entertainment: A New York Times Magazine feature is going to be a Netflix documentary series, and Brad Pitt bought the movie rights to the story of how the Times broke the Harvey Weinstein story. Also coming: a four-part series for Showtime about the Times newsroom during the first year of the Trump administration.
New York Times

Media startups



SilverKris, Singapore Airlines’ in-flight magazine, nailed it with their recent redesign by Ink.

I usually have the same attitude to in-flight magazines as I do to, say, a swift slap across the face: I’d really just rather not, thanks. But this reworked version was good enough for me to forget my Economy Class kneelessness, even though the cover is easily the most forgettable part of the whole redesign: a crowded image with no focal point. But here’s why I love this redesign: 1. The layout and typography have integrity in that they are led by the content. 2. The section fronts have bold, opinionated design. 3. The reading experience is immaculate — even though they crowd little surprise nuggets in the gutter. 4. The illustrations by Stuart Patience are delicious. 5. The writing isn’t all travel-fluff and doesn’t suck. 6. Those are some mad infographics skillz. Here's an interview with the Ink creative director.
The Design Air

The Malay Mail did a website redesign.

Load times were a priority, and the new site scores well on that front. The digital team also prioritised monetizing content and enhancing their “programmatic setup”. For me, this is translating into lots of badly-placed ads for pointless leather accessories in duplicate and Outbrain-forward sewage. They are testing a new section with Mandarin content for Malaysians working in Singapore, which says good things about their user research. Structurally, the website is fine, although better hierarchy on the home and story pages would be a good idea. (Also, those Open Sans headlines need some kerning; they’re w a y t o o l o o s e.) I’m impressed with how their head of digital responded to a question about the cost of the revamp: he said the company saw it as an investment rather than an expense. Respect.
Marketing Interactive

The article page is arguably the most vital page for a news website.

Getting it right across platforms is the Holy Grail. Last week, The New York Times took a giant step towards getting it right. This involved streamlining internal efficiencies on their CMS as well as a better user experience across mobile and desktop on web and native apps. Advertising also got a major overhaul: they killed their cluttered right rail of smaller banner ads for larger, full-width, midstream ads for a much cleaner read—and it’s working: “Ads on the new page are achieving twice the click-through rate of our old design, and initial studies show higher brand recall and four-times the reader attention to ads.” Read about the process here.
New York Times

“Hi, so did you hear that crazy phone call that, umm, the Google Duplex robot assistant made to the hair salon?”

She had the whole uptalk (ending verbal statements with that millennialesque question mark subconsciously designed to maximise responsiveness) thing going on? as well as an “mmm-hmmm?” and even an “er”? It wasn’t just how real it was that blew my mind; it was that the person on the other end of the phone was able to have a complete conversation without suspecting anything. I think the tech is amazing; I think the the whole construct is creepy. Would Turing give the bot full marks? Hear it for yourself.
The Guardian

Google’s Duplex bot will now identify itself as a robot on the phone.

There were some serious concerns that Google was putting the ‘dupe’ in Duplex: “Silicon Valley is ethically lost, rudderless and has not learned a thing”. The company has clarified: “It’s important to us that users and businesses have a good experience with this service, and transparency is a key part of that.” What is it going to say, though: “Hey there, I’m Rishad’s bot assistant, so don’t be freaked out.”?