How pro-Duterte bloggers went from the margins to the mainstream of Philippine politics on the back of fake news.

Alleged 'keyboard trolls' and the twisting of facts have played a key role in the Duterte presidency.

By Jake Soriano
Splice Philippines

On August 21 last year, Philippine police gunned down Kian delos Santos, making the 17-year-old student another casualty in President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs.

Though thousands had already been killed in the brutal crackdown, a centerpiece of the year-old government’s policies, the teenager’s death in the city of Caloocan sparked protests after police accounts of the shooting diverged from those of witnesses and CCTV footage.

Amid a rising backlash, presidential communications assistant secretary Margaux “Mocha” Uson, who before her appointment was a prominent pro-Duterte social media personality and blogger, posted on Twitter a report about a model police officer killed in a drug operation, challenging the president’s critics to attend the funeral.

The report, however, was published a year earlier.

In the Philippines, there is nothing new about government officials playing loose with the facts for political gain.

“Fake news and propaganda have long been employed in politics,” says Lisa Garcia, executive director of the Foundation for Media Alternatives, a nonprofit that uses information and communications technologies to promote democratization.

“But with the current social media technologies, these spread quickly, and that’s what’s different,” she adds.

There are many examples of the often problematic interactions between public policy and the current online ecosystem of heightened and persistent mis- and disinformation.

Duterte’s online supporters, most notably bloggers such as Mocha, have been able to make their way from the margins to the government mainstream, in the process shaping public discourse and policy.

Cynical communications strategy

The use of social media has been integral to the Duterte government and can be traced back to his unorthodox road to the presidency.

“You know what, we used social media because we do not have the money,” says Nic Gabunada, who led the Duterte camp’s social media team during the 2016 election campaign.

The campaign sought, and won, engagement among social media users. But such engagement, not present in traditional media, has also led to extreme behavior from Duterte supporters, including the bullying of critics.

“I know that there are shortcomings,” Gabunada concedes. “Since this is a movement, you cannot control everybody.”

Reports of a “keyboard army” supposedly paid up to Php 3,000 ($60) a day to operate social media accounts to amplify support for the president or attack his critics, during the elections and even after, hound the administration.

A 2017 Oxford University study found evidence that the Duterte camp spent around $200,000 on funding some 400 to 500 “keyboard trolls”, which the president has denied.

The recent publication by the U.S. nonprofit Freedom House of its global internet freedom report revived discussion of the issue but a presidential spokesperson has also denied the charge.

Nonetheless, the social media strategy bolstered Duterte, and he won the presidency by a landslide.

Duterte pays tribute to press aide Margaux “Mocha” Uson in Pasay City in October 2017. Photo: Richard Madelo/Handout.

Bloggers take government posts

Thus began the assimilation into key government posts, including in the palace communications office and the foreign affairs department, of several of the president’s staunch online supporters.

Defending his appointment of Uson earlier last year, Duterte said he owed her a debt of gratitude after she worked for free during the elections.

Currently, Uson heads the presidential communications social media office, which among other functions, handles an interim policy on the accreditation of bloggers who wish to cover the activities of the president.

Other pro-Duterte bloggers who now work with Uson are suspended lawyer Trixie Cruz Angeles, who has the title of consultant, and Lorraine Badoy, who has been appointed undersecretary.

Badoy, previously also an undersecretary at the social welfare department, came under fire in March 2017 for hurling accusations of child pornography at Duterte critics.

“And when they are criticized, they say they made their statements in their personal capacity,” Garcia said.

Indeed, in early October, during a legislative inquiry on fake news, Uson fell back on the same excuse after she was accused of spreading disinformation, prompting Sen. Nancy Binay to declare, “It might be high time for you to decide if you want to be a blogger or an assistant secretary.”

Despite pushback, misinformation persists

With the growing penetration of social media throughout in the Philippines, it is easy to see why misinformation persists.

Sixty percent of the country’s 103 million people are internet users, and 60 percent of those online are active social media users. Mobile subscriptions outnumber the population count, at 129.4 million.

Many users access social media, notably Facebook, through free basic services, which becomes problematic when experience becomes limited by what is only made available for free.

“You can see the headline, but if you want to see the content, you have to pay,” says Garcia. “What if you don’t have the means? What if the headline is a bit misleading?”

A disquieting detail in the killing of delos Santos demonstrates the dangers of disinformation in the age of social media: the police officers implicated in the case told a legislative inquiry the boy was a drug courier, citing social media posts that alleged drug links.

Uson, when flagged by social media users on her misleading post about the police officer killed in a drug bust, quickly deleted her post and faced few repercussions. A few months later, however, she posted on her Facebook page allegations of corruption and ill-gotten wealth, supposedly sourced from fake websites, against an opposition senator, for which she now faces libel charges.

“I can understand the president appointing people whom he trusts,” Garcia says, but adds that government officials should be held to a higher standard when it comes to disseminating information.

“When you have so many followers on social media, what you say, even if untrue, might be believed,” she said.

Jake Soriano

Jake Soriano edits and writes reports for VERA Files. Follow Jake Soriano on Twitter.

Our newsletters are read around the world by some of the smartest people in media. Subscribe here.

From this week


Facebook’s paralysis and negligence in tackling hate speech keep coming up in conversations.

Reuters — which has two of its journalists in prison in Myanmar for reporting on the country’s genocide — put out a special report on Facebook’s hate speech problem in the country. Facebook doesn’t have an employee in this country. Speech moderation is outsourced to Accenture in Kuala Lumpur in a secretive project called “Honey Badger”. But it’s not clear how many Burmese speakers are on the job. People working on the project sign a one-year renewable contract, and agree to never divulge that Facebook is the client. This is what Reuters found out about the project.

Facebook’s head of news partnerships Campbell Brown made some off-the-record comments to Australian media executives about traffic referrals that stirred the hornet’s nest.

The Australian, breaking professional protocol in publishing details of that session, quoted her as allegedly saying, “We are not interested in talking to you about your traffic and referrals any more. That is the old world and there is no going back”. Of course, this isn’t new to many publishers who’ve seen their referrals dwindle in the past year. But it’s another reminder to everyone: Facebook is in the business of Facebook. If you’re in publishing and you’re still counting on Facebook’s referral traffic to keep your traffic numbers up, you’re delusional.
Nieman Lab



How do you redesign The Wall Street Journal’s 126 newsletters?

1. You cull them by a third. 2. You nudge your readers to subscribe with a prompt. 3. You update market info — in real time. 4. You let people hit reply. People like that whole responding thing. 5. Test readers’ resistance to your paywall. 6. You test a new email platform that plays to your strengths. 7. You add whimsy. At the end of it all, a newsletter is a conversation, and it takes more than machine learning to keep that going. All aboard for whimsy, I say.
Nieman Lab

The product design process can be notoriously difficult.

This is mostly because it’s often seen as an artistic moment of genius broken down into deliverables to a client waiting for results in a process with unstructured feedback. This is also known as herding cats. But we tend to forget that most effective product design works to fix a business problem in a collaborative manner that establishes goals, relies on prototyping, user feedback, and testing. How this product designer explores and tests his own journey is a lesson in process and how we work with it.
UX Design


Thanks for subscribing!