A project on Medium to chronicle Indonesia’s anti-communist purges is now a moving digital scrapbook.

Hundreds of writers are volunteering their time to contribute to Ingat 65, a journalist-led project to ensure the 1960s massacres are never forgotten.

By Erin Cook
Splice Indonesia

It is difficult to find consensus on how many people were killed in Indonesia’s 1965-66 anti-communist purges. Some estimates put it at 500,000 deaths; others reach three million.

For decades, there was one official story about what had happened: nothing at all.

Only in recent years has it been possible for the official narrative to be freely challenged. And now a new generation of savvy young journalists is doing just that through the Ingat 65 — ‘Remember 65’ — project on Medium to chronicle Indonesia’s hidden history.

Chief editor Prodita Sabarini says that mainstream publications, particularly Tempo, Kompas and the Jakarta Post, have improved their coverage of the political implications of the period, as well as the demands of survivors and their families. But she believes personal narratives, such as those advanced by Ingat 65, are the most powerful tool to ensure the era is remembered.   

“I was one of those people who believed communism is bad,” as a result of the skewed education she received. “It was imprinted.”

A project is born

The idea for Ingat 65 was conceived after Sabarini saw the critically acclaimed 2012 documentary “The Act of Killing”, which was banned from cinemas in Indonesia, while completing a prestigious fellowship in the U.S. She was able to speak with the director, Joshua Oppenheimer, and their conversations began to change her perception of the past.

“For me personally, I started to acknowledge the sheer scale of the crime that happened as an adult. After a lot of deep talking and thinking, I returned to Indonesia wanting to do something about ‘65,” Sabarini says.

The film also opened up her eyes to how effective propaganda can be: as a teenager during the final Suharto years, she says, she was unaware that she was living under a dictatorship.

Launched in March 2016, Ingat 65 has been heavily influenced by a New York Times storywall project that saw writers from the transgender community share personal narratives. In that time, Ingat 65 has grown into a moving digital scrapbook featuring personal essays and stories from more than 100 volunteer writers.

“Sharing personal stories is valid, and it works, because there’s no assigning of blameit’s all self-expression and people trying to claim space,” she says. “Everybody should be able to express themselves.”

It’s an ethos that has paid off for Ingat 65, which has been able to steadily catalogue stories that otherwise would be in danger of disappearing forever along with the aging generation that lived through the massacre.  

A selection of propaganda leaflets blaming the Indonesian Communist Party for the 30 September 1965 movement. (Wikimedia Commons/Davidelit)
A selection of propaganda leaflets blaming the Indonesian Communist Party for the 30 September 1965 movement. (Wikimedia Commons/Davidelit)

Harassment and intimidation

But the project faces two major obstacles, according to Sabarini, an editor at The Conversation Indonesia who runs Ingat 65 in her free time.

Interest in fully addressing the crimes of 1965 waxes and wanes. Each year around September 30, the date on which alleged members of the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) assassinated six army generals in a failed coup attempt, schoolchildren are made to watch a Suharto-era propaganda video that justifies the ensuing year of violence, while human rights activists call for resolution. Outside of that period, there is little sustained interest in the case.

And communism not only is still highly stigmatised in Indonesia, but illegal, and being accused of harboring sympathy toward PKI can lead to jail time. Indonesia does not share many of the tougher media restrictions imposed by some of its regional neighbors, but a culture of self-censorship persists amid intimidation by powerful political groups. At a cultural event held in Central Jakarta in 2017, hardline conservatives gathered to protest against young left-wing activists, accusing the group of being communists. While Sabarini had left the venue prior to the altercation, the Ingat 65 editorial team has also been targeted by anti-communists.

“We were cyber-harassedthey took photos from our Facebook [page] and said that we were affiliated with PKI,” Sabarini says.

The attack came just a few months after President Joko Widodo, himself regularly the target of communist slurs from opponents, said PKI should be rooted out.

 

An editorial cartoon from the front page of the Communist Party of Indonesia (PKI) newspaper
An editorial cartoon from the front page of the Communist Party of Indonesia (PKI) newspaper "Harian Rakyat" published 2 October 1965.

She is joined by a team of volunteers, largely made up of writers and academic, who have also faced online and physical harassment during periods of intense scrutiny.

“Being associated with communism is dangerous, even if you’re not communist,” says Sabarini. “Some of us were very, very scared, but we do this because we care. A lot of us have never been street activists—we’re just regular people who have jobs and want to do something.”

“We laid low for a bit and then refocused on the core of our movement, which is personal storytelling.” 

Erin Cook

Erin Cook is a Jakarta-based journalist covering Asean and Southeast Asian politics. She curates the Dari Mulut ke Mulut newsletter, bringing together the top stories and best in analysis from the region every Friday. Follow Erin Cook on Twitter.

From this week

Platforms

Columbia Journalism Review takes a hard look at the journalism funding done by Facebook and Google.

There are millions of dollars going into this space. While many are happy to take the money on the table, others question the ethics behind it. “The British Empire wanted trains in Kenya and India to run well, too. So their concerns are sincere, but the effect is more often than not a deeper immersion in and dependence on these platforms.” Of course this isn’t an issue unique to the tech giants — grant-giving NGOs have also faced similar critics.
Columbia Journalism Review

Governments & policy

Tools

Trends

New Naratif put together a solid story on how the Muslim Cyber Army works in Indonesia.

If you haven’t heard of the MCA (no, not that MCA in Malaysia!), they have been spreading fake news and driving hate speech along religious and ethnic lines. Worrying trend, especially in a country that’s been fighting fake news factories like Saracen. What makes this one different? “MCA looks more ideological, has thousands of networks in different parts of Indonesia and therefore the destructive power of this group is greater than that of Saracen.”
New Naratif

Transformations

The New York Times is partnering with FX and Hulu on a weekly documentary series called…The Weekly.

It centres around stories from the Times and the journalists that work them. This comes hot on the heels of The Daily, their incredible podcast about one daily story from the Times newsroom. This is part of the Times’ ongoing foray into entertainment: A New York Times Magazine feature is going to be a Netflix documentary series, and Brad Pitt bought the movie rights to the story of how the Times broke the Harvey Weinstein story. Also coming: a four-part series for Showtime about the Times newsroom during the first year of the Trump administration.
New York Times

Media startups

Talent

Design

SilverKris, Singapore Airlines’ in-flight magazine, nailed it with their recent redesign by Ink.

I usually have the same attitude to in-flight magazines as I do to, say, a swift slap across the face: I’d really just rather not, thanks. But this reworked version was good enough for me to forget my Economy Class kneelessness, even though the cover is easily the most forgettable part of the whole redesign: a crowded image with no focal point. But here’s why I love this redesign: 1. The layout and typography have integrity in that they are led by the content. 2. The section fronts have bold, opinionated design. 3. The reading experience is immaculate — even though they crowd little surprise nuggets in the gutter. 4. The illustrations by Stuart Patience are delicious. 5. The writing isn’t all travel-fluff and doesn’t suck. 6. Those are some mad infographics skillz. Here's an interview with the Ink creative director.
The Design Air

The Malay Mail did a website redesign.

Load times were a priority, and the new site scores well on that front. The digital team also prioritised monetizing content and enhancing their “programmatic setup”. For me, this is translating into lots of badly-placed ads for pointless leather accessories in duplicate and Outbrain-forward sewage. They are testing a new section with Mandarin content for Malaysians working in Singapore, which says good things about their user research. Structurally, the website is fine, although better hierarchy on the home and story pages would be a good idea. (Also, those Open Sans headlines need some kerning; they’re w a y t o o l o o s e.) I’m impressed with how their head of digital responded to a question about the cost of the revamp: he said the company saw it as an investment rather than an expense. Respect.
Marketing Interactive

The article page is arguably the most vital page for a news website.

Getting it right across platforms is the Holy Grail. Last week, The New York Times took a giant step towards getting it right. This involved streamlining internal efficiencies on their CMS as well as a better user experience across mobile and desktop on web and native apps. Advertising also got a major overhaul: they killed their cluttered right rail of smaller banner ads for larger, full-width, midstream ads for a much cleaner read—and it’s working: “Ads on the new page are achieving twice the click-through rate of our old design, and initial studies show higher brand recall and four-times the reader attention to ads.” Read about the process here.
New York Times

“Hi, so did you hear that crazy phone call that, umm, the Google Duplex robot assistant made to the hair salon?”

She had the whole uptalk (ending verbal statements with that millennialesque question mark subconsciously designed to maximise responsiveness) thing going on? as well as an “mmm-hmmm?” and even an “er”? It wasn’t just how real it was that blew my mind; it was that the person on the other end of the phone was able to have a complete conversation without suspecting anything. I think the tech is amazing; I think the the whole construct is creepy. Would Turing give the bot full marks? Hear it for yourself.
The Guardian

Google’s Duplex bot will now identify itself as a robot on the phone.

There were some serious concerns that Google was putting the ‘dupe’ in Duplex: “Silicon Valley is ethically lost, rudderless and has not learned a thing”. The company has clarified: “It’s important to us that users and businesses have a good experience with this service, and transparency is a key part of that.” What is it going to say, though: “Hey there, I’m Rishad’s bot assistant, so don’t be freaked out.”?
Twitter

Notables