Seeking a wider readership, The Australian reaches out to Chinese readers Down Under.

The national broadsheet is the first major commercial outlet to offer news in a language other than English.

By John Power
Splice Australia

At first glance, Chinese speakers might not seem like the most promising target market for an Australian broadsheet trying to expand its readership. But that’s not how News Corporation’s flagship title The Australian sees it.

In September, the right-leaning national newspaper launched a Chinese-language website aimed at Australia’s growing Chinese community. While community newspapers have catered to Chinese and other ethnic communities here for decades, The Australian is the first major commercial outlet to offer news specifically catered to non-English speakers. The site features translated news and commentary from the newspaper, as well as original content and luxury lifestyle material from News Corp. ventures Wish Magazine and Mansion Global.

“We’d been exploring the idea of a Chinese-language site for several years, but wanted to take the time to get the model right,” says Stuart Fagg, general manager of The Australian’s digital business. “Chinese Australians are such a growing part of our nation that it seemed logical to extend our product suite to cover Chinese-language content.”

Tapping into new audiences

High levels of Chinese immigration to Australia in recent decades have created a sizeable pool of potential news consumers and advertisers that remain largely untapped by mainstream media. Mandarin Chinese is the second-most widely spoken language in Australia today, according to census data. Some 600,000 people speak the language at home, the 2016 population tally found, nearly double the figure recorded in 2011.

When it comes to the economy and business, Australia and China are arguably more intertwined still. In 2016-2017, Australia’s two-way trade with China amounted to $155 billion, almost a quarter of its total trade and more than double its trade with the U.S.

Given these links, it’s perhaps not surprising that The Australian’s Chinese-language venture has proved popular, with readership quadrupling since the start of the year, though Fagg did not reveal exact figures.

“There’s been a huge amount of interest,” says Fagg. “That partly stems from the fact that we are really the first mainstream Australian news brand to create a Chinese-language news product. But it’s also related to the challenges in reaching that audience in a contextual, brand-safe environment. While the audience we are reaching is smaller than our English-language reach, they are incredibly hard to target through mainstream media.”

Importance of original content

An important element of the site’s positive reception, Fagg says, has been its evolution from being simply a home for translated articles to a source of original content as well.

“It would have been easy to just machine-translate our content from English to Chinese, but we wanted to make sure our journalism maintained its premium tone and context,” he says. “We didn’t want that to get lost in translation, so to speak.”

“We settled initially on taking a highly curated approach, with a selection of stories being human translated each day, and then expanded that with the hire of our Chinese language editor, Heidi Han, in February of this year. Since Heidi joined we’ve seen an increase in exclusive content created for the site and the audience has grown in line with that.”

Fagg is candid about how the launch and growth of the site has involved a lot of experimentation and learning on the job.

“When it comes to engaging a target audience that has completely different media consumption habits, there’s a lot of experimentation and a steep learning curve,” he says.

But based on the encouraging start, Fagg sees a promising future for Chinese content at the country’s most-read national newspaper.

“We’re active in channels like WeChat, which is such an important platform for our target audience, but we’re also seeing good audience engagement from other social channels and directly,” he says. “So we see the success we are getting from this site as a bonus on top of our regular commercial efforts. I think in time that we’ll absolutely be putting growth targets and significant commercial revenue and audience metrics in place.”

John Power

John Power is a journalist whose work has appeared in The Guardian, The Christian Science Monitor, Quartz, The Age, The South China Morning Post, The Irish Times, The Nikkei Asian Review, and Al Jazeera. Previously based in Seoul, he currently reports from Melbourne. Follow John Power on Twitter.

From this week


Columbia Journalism Review takes a hard look at the journalism funding done by Facebook and Google.

There are millions of dollars going into this space. While many are happy to take the money on the table, others question the ethics behind it. “The British Empire wanted trains in Kenya and India to run well, too. So their concerns are sincere, but the effect is more often than not a deeper immersion in and dependence on these platforms.” Of course this isn’t an issue unique to the tech giants — grant-giving NGOs have also faced similar critics.
Columbia Journalism Review

Governments & policy



New Naratif put together a solid story on how the Muslim Cyber Army works in Indonesia.

If you haven’t heard of the MCA (no, not that MCA in Malaysia!), they have been spreading fake news and driving hate speech along religious and ethnic lines. Worrying trend, especially in a country that’s been fighting fake news factories like Saracen. What makes this one different? “MCA looks more ideological, has thousands of networks in different parts of Indonesia and therefore the destructive power of this group is greater than that of Saracen.”
New Naratif


The New York Times is partnering with FX and Hulu on a weekly documentary series called…The Weekly.

It centres around stories from the Times and the journalists that work them. This comes hot on the heels of The Daily, their incredible podcast about one daily story from the Times newsroom. This is part of the Times’ ongoing foray into entertainment: A New York Times Magazine feature is going to be a Netflix documentary series, and Brad Pitt bought the movie rights to the story of how the Times broke the Harvey Weinstein story. Also coming: a four-part series for Showtime about the Times newsroom during the first year of the Trump administration.
New York Times

Media startups



SilverKris, Singapore Airlines’ in-flight magazine, nailed it with their recent redesign by Ink.

I usually have the same attitude to in-flight magazines as I do to, say, a swift slap across the face: I’d really just rather not, thanks. But this reworked version was good enough for me to forget my Economy Class kneelessness, even though the cover is easily the most forgettable part of the whole redesign: a crowded image with no focal point. But here’s why I love this redesign: 1. The layout and typography have integrity in that they are led by the content. 2. The section fronts have bold, opinionated design. 3. The reading experience is immaculate — even though they crowd little surprise nuggets in the gutter. 4. The illustrations by Stuart Patience are delicious. 5. The writing isn’t all travel-fluff and doesn’t suck. 6. Those are some mad infographics skillz. Here's an interview with the Ink creative director.
The Design Air

The Malay Mail did a website redesign.

Load times were a priority, and the new site scores well on that front. The digital team also prioritised monetizing content and enhancing their “programmatic setup”. For me, this is translating into lots of badly-placed ads for pointless leather accessories in duplicate and Outbrain-forward sewage. They are testing a new section with Mandarin content for Malaysians working in Singapore, which says good things about their user research. Structurally, the website is fine, although better hierarchy on the home and story pages would be a good idea. (Also, those Open Sans headlines need some kerning; they’re w a y t o o l o o s e.) I’m impressed with how their head of digital responded to a question about the cost of the revamp: he said the company saw it as an investment rather than an expense. Respect.
Marketing Interactive

The article page is arguably the most vital page for a news website.

Getting it right across platforms is the Holy Grail. Last week, The New York Times took a giant step towards getting it right. This involved streamlining internal efficiencies on their CMS as well as a better user experience across mobile and desktop on web and native apps. Advertising also got a major overhaul: they killed their cluttered right rail of smaller banner ads for larger, full-width, midstream ads for a much cleaner read—and it’s working: “Ads on the new page are achieving twice the click-through rate of our old design, and initial studies show higher brand recall and four-times the reader attention to ads.” Read about the process here.
New York Times

“Hi, so did you hear that crazy phone call that, umm, the Google Duplex robot assistant made to the hair salon?”

She had the whole uptalk (ending verbal statements with that millennialesque question mark subconsciously designed to maximise responsiveness) thing going on? as well as an “mmm-hmmm?” and even an “er”? It wasn’t just how real it was that blew my mind; it was that the person on the other end of the phone was able to have a complete conversation without suspecting anything. I think the tech is amazing; I think the the whole construct is creepy. Would Turing give the bot full marks? Hear it for yourself.
The Guardian

Google’s Duplex bot will now identify itself as a robot on the phone.

There were some serious concerns that Google was putting the ‘dupe’ in Duplex: “Silicon Valley is ethically lost, rudderless and has not learned a thing”. The company has clarified: “It’s important to us that users and businesses have a good experience with this service, and transparency is a key part of that.” What is it going to say, though: “Hey there, I’m Rishad’s bot assistant, so don’t be freaked out.”?